Archaeologists And Anthropologists Codexery

Richard Borshay Lee

Anthropologist known for !Kung San fieldwork and traditionalist views in the Kalahari Debate.

Richard Borshay Lee

Richard Borshay Lee is a Canadian anthropologist known for his extensive ethnographic research among the !Kung San, a San community in the Kalahari Desert. His work, including the 1979 book *The !Kung San: Men, Women, and Work in a Foraging Society*, placed him at the center of the Kalahari Debate, a scholarly dispute that began in the 1980s among anthropologists, archaeologists, and historians. Lee is a traditionalist, viewing the San as historically isolated and independent hunter-gatherers, separate from nearby societies. His studies, primarily conducted in the Dobe area near the Tsodilo Hills, involved deep immersion in !Kung San culture, where he was adopted into a kinship and given the name /Tontah, meaning “White-Man.”

field
Anthropology

Lore & Background

Richard Borshay Lee conducted early and extensive ethnographic research among the !Kung San. In his 1979 book *The !Kung San: Men, Women, and Work in a Foraging Society*, his main goal was to be fully immersed in the !Kung San culture so that he could fully understand their way of life. He was puzzled as to how these people seemed to be living such an easy and happy life that relied heavily on hard work and the availability of food. Most of his studies of the San took place in the Dobe area, near the Tsodilo Hills. He was adopted into a kinship and given the name /Tontah which meant “White-Man.” He claims that the San were an isolated hunter-gatherer society that changed to farming and foraging at the end of the 1970s. Most of Lee's historical data comes from oral stories told by the !Kung San because they did not have anything written down. According to Lee the San were originally afraid of contact with outsiders. Lee reports that the men did the hunting and hard labor while the women did housework. He later found out that the San weren't just hunter-gatherers, but also herders, foragers, and farmers. In his book he states, “I learned that most of the men had had experience herding cattle at some point in their lives and that many men had owned cattle and goats in the past.” He claims that they have learned all of this on their own. The San wanted wage pay for farming and taking care of cattle, goats, and sheep. This was their new way of life.

Reader's Guide

Lee's work is central to the traditionalist side of the Kalahari Debate. He and other traditionalists, including Irven DeVore, consider the San to have been, historically, isolated and independent hunter/gatherers separate from nearby societies. The traditionalists believe that the San have adapted over time but without help from other societies, placing emphasis on the cultural continuity and integrity of the San peoples. Lee's 1979 book details his findings, including that the San were originally afraid of contact with outsiders and that they changed to farming and foraging at the end of the 1970s. Revisionists like Edwin Wilmsen and James Denbow oppose these views, arguing that the San have not always been isolated but have played important economic roles in surrounding communities and have become a dispossessed and marginalized people. The debate continues with scholars critiquing each other's work. For instance, Lee called out Wilmsen for mistaking the word “oxen” for “onins”, which meant “onions” in an old map of the Kalahari region, leading to Lee's article "Oxen or Onions."

Did You Know?

More in Archaeologists And Anthropologists 1-23

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →